Moore v. United States
318 F. Supp. 3d 188
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 18, 2018·No. Civil Action No. 17-1036 (RMC)·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
IV. CONCLUSION
The Court finds that the MVCRA does not apply retroactively to Plaintiff's negligence claim, and that Defendant sufficiently raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence to survive a motion to strike. The Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Contributory Negligence Defense. A memorializing Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. United States, 318 F. Supp. 3d 188 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
318 F. Supp. 3d 188 (Moore v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Food Recovery Network, Inc. v. Means Database, Inc. D/B/A foodrecovery.org
District of Columbia, 2026
Center for Biological Diversity v. Nesvik
District of Columbia, 2026
Untitled Case
S.D. Texas, 2026
Stewart v. Fj Property Payroll, LLC
District of Columbia, 2026
William v. Fort Myer Construction Corp.
District of Columbia, 2025
Caison v. Dejoy
District of Columbia, 2025
Zuk v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District of Columbia, 2025
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Smith
District of Columbia, 2024
Estate of Amer Fakhoury v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District of Columbia, 2022
Marin v. Apple-Metro, Inc.
E.D. New York, 2020
Dove v. Apple-Metro, Inc.
E.D. New York, 2020
Taylor Energy Company LLC v. United States
District of Columbia, 2020
Crawford v. Sessions
District of Columbia, 2019