Moore v. United States
318 F. Supp. 3d 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJuly 18, 2018
DocketCivil Action No. 17-1036 (RMC)
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 318 F. Supp. 3d 188 (Moore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moore v. United States, 318 F. Supp. 3d 188 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
Opinion
IV. CONCLUSION
The Court finds that the MVCRA does not apply retroactively to Plaintiff's negligence claim, and that Defendant sufficiently raised the affirmative defense of contributory negligence to survive a motion to strike. The Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Contributory Negligence Defense. A memorializing Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
William v. Fort Myer Construction Corp.
District of Columbia, 2025
Caison v. Dejoy
District of Columbia, 2025
Zuk v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District of Columbia, 2025
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Smith
District of Columbia, 2024
Estate of Amer Fakhoury v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District of Columbia, 2022
Marin v. Apple-Metro, Inc.
E.D. New York, 2020
Dove v. Apple-Metro, Inc.
E.D. New York, 2020
Taylor Energy Company LLC v. United States
District of Columbia, 2020
Crawford v. Sessions
District of Columbia, 2019
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
318 F. Supp. 3d 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-united-states-cadc-2018.