Moore v. State
126 S.W.2d 667, 136 Tex. Crim. 544, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 61
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 403 →
Opinions
Appellant was convicted of passing a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
Appellant's appeal bond herein is fatally defective in that nowhere therein does it state that he had been "convicted" of the defense charged in the indictment, which offense is that of passing a forged instrument, knowing the same to have been forged. See Teel v. State,
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 126 S.W.2d 667, 136 Tex. Crim. 544, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 61 (Tex. 1938).
126 S.W.2d 667 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Teel v. State
91 S.W.2d 747 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Otts v. State
116 S.W.2d 1084 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1938)