Moore v. State

88 S.W.2d 1118
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 97
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 18, 1935·No. No. 17844·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This prosecution was for a violation of the law against possessing intoxicating liquors for purposes of sale (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended), which was in force prior to the adoption of the recent Liquor Control Act passed by the 44th Legislature, 2d Called Sess., 1935 (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq.). In the case of Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, delivered November 27, 1935, we held that all prosecutions of this character would have to be dismissed.

For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment in this case is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. State, 88 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. 1935).

88 S.W.2d 1118 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)