Moore v. State

76 S.W.2d 1114

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Tex. Crim. 97 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 12, 1934·No. No. 17084·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of burglary, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of burglary, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Moore v. State, 76 S.W.2d 1114 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

76 S.W.2d 1114 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.