Moore v. State

110 S.W.3d 31, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8333, 2002 WL 31628507
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 21, 2002
DocketNo. 10-02-076-CR
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.W.3d 31 (Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. State, 110 S.W.3d 31, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8333, 2002 WL 31628507 (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This Court has twice denied motions by the State to file a brief in the above cause exceeding the 50 page limit established by Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.4. Tex. R.App. P. 38.4. Thereafter, the State filed a brief on October 29, 2002 purporting to comply with Rule 38.4. On further review, the Court has determined that the State’s brief does not comply with Rule 38.4.

The State’s brief provides “a more complete statement of facts” in an appendix, which contains twelve pages of “facts relevant to [the issues presented].” Rule 38.1(j)(2) expressly provides, “Items should not be included in the appendix to attempt to avoid the page limits for the brief.” Id 38.1(j)(2).1

The appellant’s brief presents nine issues in thirty-three pages, excluding the pages containing the identity of parties and counsel, the table of contents, the index of authorities, the statement of the case, the issues presented, the signature, and the certificate of service. Id. 38.4. The State is directed to prepare and file an amended brief no longer than fifty pages, excluding the pages containing the identity of parties and counsel, the table of contents, the index of authorities, the statement of the case, the issues presented, the signature, the certificate of service, and the appendix, if any. Id 38.4, 38.9(a). The State shall not include items in an appendix to avoid the 50-page limit of Rule 38.4. The State’s brief shall be filed [32]*32within ten days after the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted. If the State fails to comply, the Court will strike the State’s October 29 brief and submit this cause on the appellant’s brief alone. Id. 38.9(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ali L. Ghanbari v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.W.3d 31, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8333, 2002 WL 31628507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-state-texapp-2002.