Moore v. SouthTrust Corp

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. SouthTrust Corp. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 F. App'x 533
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. 05-1742·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1742

JEROME D. MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTHTRUST CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-391-2)

Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome D. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, John T. McDonald, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Jerome D. Moore appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for SouthTrust Corporation and dismissing

his claims of breach of contract and violations of the Electronic

Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693 (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. SouthTrust Corp.,

No. CA-04-391-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. SouthTrust Corp, (4th Cir. 2006).

Moore v. SouthTrust Corp (Moore v. SouthTrust Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related