Moore v. SouthTrust Corp
This text of Moore v. SouthTrust Corp (Moore v. SouthTrust Corp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1742
JEROME D. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTHTRUST CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-04-391-2)
Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome D. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, John T. McDonald, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerome D. Moore appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for SouthTrust Corporation and dismissing
his claims of breach of contract and violations of the Electronic
Funds Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1693 (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Moore v. SouthTrust Corp.,
No. CA-04-391-2-JBF (E.D. Va. June 10, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Moore v. SouthTrust Corp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-southtrust-corp-ca4-2006.