Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2399

CLARENCE MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHMOND NURSING HOME; BORIS T. SIMMONS, Police Officer, 1312-6,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-683)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Barnett, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

In this civil action, Clarence Moore appeals the district

court’s orders: (1) denying his motion to reopen, to “reinstate the

case in the same position as before dismissal,” and for a new

trial; and (2) denying his motion to file a supplemental answer.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. CA-99-683 (E.D. Va.

Dec. 1, 2005; Dec. 9, 2005). We deny Moore’s pending motion to

supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -