Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home

Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home

201 F. App'x 154

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 28, 2006·No. 06-1759·Unpublished

Opinion

*155 PER CURIAM:

Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Consideration of some rights concerning nunc pro tunc” and accompanying submissions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 3:99-cv-00683-RLW (E.D.Va. June 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*155 PER CURIAM:

Clarence Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Consideration of some rights concerning nunc pro tunc” and accompanying submissions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 3:99-cv-00683-RLW (E.D.Va. June 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, 201 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

201 F. App'x 154 (Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.