Moore v. Olsness

Supreme Court

Moore v. Olsness

245 U.S. 627, 38 S. Ct. 60

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 5, 1917·No. No. 280·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (2) Butler v. [628]*628Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402, 415, 416; Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548, 559; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; (3) Railroad Company v. County of Otoe, 16 Wall. 667, 676; Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175.

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (2) Butler v. [628]*628Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402, 415, 416; Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548, 559; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; (3) Railroad Company v. County of Otoe, 16 Wall. 667, 676; Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175.

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.

Moore v. Olsness, 245 U.S. 627, 38 S. Ct. 60 (1917).

Pincite

245 U.S. 627 (Moore v. Olsness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related