Moore v. Morgan

292 S.E.2d 514, 162 Ga. App. 639, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2273
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 18, 1982
Docket64033
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 292 S.E.2d 514 (Moore v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Morgan, 292 S.E.2d 514, 162 Ga. App. 639, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2273 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict for the defendant. The sole enumeration of error is that the evidence demanded a verdict for the plaintiff who was thereby entitled to a directed verdict. Held:

The notice of appeal recites: “The Clerk will please prepare the record, omitting nothing therefrom.” No mention is made concerning a transcript and none has been forwarded to this court. In Steadham v. State of Ga., 224 Ga. 78, 80 (159 SE2d 397), where the notice of appeal specified that the clerk omit “nothing” from the record, it was held: “The notice in the present appeal did not state whether a transcript of the evidence would be filed. The specification that ‘nothing’ is to be omitted from the record would not infer that the transcript is to be included, since the appellant is required to state whether the transcript will be filed, in addition to designating any portion of the record to be omitted.” Accord, City of Atlanta v. Barton, 153 Ga. App. 426 (265 SE2d 345).

“[T]he burden is upon the party assigning error to show it affirmatively by the record ...” Baldwin v. Grimes, 219 Ga. 68 (131 SE2d 563). “Where no transcript is included in the record on appeal we must assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment.” Burns v. Barnes, 154 Ga. App. 802 (1) (270 SE2d 57), and case therein cited.

Thus, under circumstances such as in the instant case, while we can not dismiss the appeal, without a transcript we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. City of Atlanta v. Barton, 153 Ga. App. 426, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Carley, J., concur. Harold E. Martin, for appellant. Harvey J. Kennedy, Jr., Howard P. Wallace, W. Franklin Freeman, Jr., for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yetman v. Walsh
639 S.E.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Thurmond v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HALL COUNTY
330 S.E.2d 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Tempo Carpet Company v. Collectible Classic Cars of Georgia, Inc.
305 S.E.2d 26 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 S.E.2d 514, 162 Ga. App. 639, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-morgan-gactapp-1982.