Baldwin v. Grimes
This text of 131 S.E.2d 563 (Baldwin v. Grimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the judgment assigned as error here requires a consideration of the evidence, which is neither set forth in the bill of exceptions, attached to it as an exhibit and properly identified by the trial judge, nor embodied in a brief or transcript of evidence approved by the trial judge and sent up as a part of the record. Accordingly, since the burden is upon the party assigning error to show it affirmatively by the record, the judgment complained of is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 SE2d 269); Cobb v. DeLong, 216 Ga. 794 (120 SE2d 177).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 S.E.2d 563, 219 Ga. 68, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-grimes-ga-1963.