Baldwin v. Grimes

131 S.E.2d 563, 219 Ga. 68, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 369
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 29, 1963·No. 22048·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

A review of the judgment assigned as error here requires a consideration of the evidence, which is neither set forth in the bill of exceptions, attached to it as an exhibit and properly identified by the trial judge, nor embodied in a brief or transcript of evidence approved by the trial judge and sent up as a part of the record. Accordingly, since the burden is upon the party assigning error to show it affirmatively by the record, the judgment complained of is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. Attaway v. Duncan, 206 Ga. 230 (56 SE2d 269); Cobb v. DeLong, 216 Ga. 794 (120 SE2d 177).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. Grimes, 131 S.E.2d 563, 219 Ga. 68, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 369 (Ga. 1963).

131 S.E.2d 563 (Baldwin v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gusky v. Candler General Hospital, Inc.
385 S.E.2d 698 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Acker v. Jenkins
343 S.E.2d 160 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Thurmond v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HALL COUNTY
330 S.E.2d 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Moore v. Morgan
292 S.E.2d 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
King v. Calhoun First National Bank
220 S.E.2d 759 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Moye v. State
193 S.E.2d 562 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Coggin v. Scoggins
141 S.E.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)