Moore v. Jacobs

89 N.W. 1134, 64 Neb. 72, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 189
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1902
DocketNo. 11,368
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 N.W. 1134 (Moore v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. Jacobs, 89 N.W. 1134, 64 Neb. 72, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 189 (Neb. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An appeal is taken by the owner of the fee title from a final order of confirmation of sale of real estate in foreclosure proceedings. None of the objections presented to the trial court as réasons why confirmation should be denied, except one, are presented or argued in brief of counsel for appellant whence such objections are to be taken and considered as .having been waived. The objections argued in the brief, save one relating to the return of the sheriff to the order of sale, which is apparently without merit, were in nowise presented to the trial court, and therefore we can not consider them on this appeal..

The order of confirmation should be, and accordingly is,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reed v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
151 N.W. 936 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 N.W. 1134, 64 Neb. 72, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-jacobs-neb-1902.