Moore v. Black Panther Party

458 U.S. 1118, 102 S. Ct. 3505
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided July 2, 1982·No. No. 81-774; No. 81-1511·Published·Cited by 64 cases

Opinion

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and cases remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

Justice Marshall would deny the petitions for writs of certiorari. Justice Powell and Justice Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore v. Black Panther Party, 458 U.S. 1118, 102 S. Ct. 3505 (1982).

458 U.S. 1118 (Moore v. Black Panther Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re: Subpoenas Served On
District of Columbia, 2023
Edwards v. Edwards
2019 Ohio 5413 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Gregorio v. Gordon
215 F. Supp. 3d 1 (District of Columbia, 2015)
Seneca Insurance v. Western Claims, Inc.
774 F.3d 1272 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
Perry v. Schwarzenegger
591 F.3d 1126 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
In re GlaxoSmithKline plc
732 N.W.2d 257 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2007)
Howard v. Gutierrez
474 F. Supp. 2d 41 (District of Columbia, 2007)
T.S. v. Boy Scouts of America
157 Wash. 2d 416 (Washington Supreme Court, 2006)
Lassa v. Rongstad
2006 WI 105 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2006)
Haas v. Bowman
62 Pa. D. & C.4th 1 (Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas, 2003)
International Action Center v. United States
207 F.R.D. 1 (District of Columbia, 2002)
Right-Price Recreation, LLC v. CPCC
21 P.3d 1157 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
Frontier Refining Inc. v. Gorman-Rupp Co.
136 F.3d 695 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
167 F.R.D. 464 (D. Kansas, 1996)
Serafino v. Hasbro, Inc.
82 F.3d 515 (First Circuit, 1996)