Home/Supreme Court/Moore, Commissioner of Patents, v. United States Ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Company

Moore, Commissioner of Patents, v. United States Ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Company

216 U.S. 608, 54 L. Ed. 636, 30 S. Ct. 575, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1930
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 7, 1910
Docket115
StatusPublished

This text of 216 U.S. 608 (Moore, Commissioner of Patents, v. United States Ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore, Commissioner of Patents, v. United States Ex Rel. Newcomb Motor Company, 216 U.S. 608, 54 L. Ed. 636, 30 S. Ct. 575, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1930 (1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed for want of •jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1; Rousseau v. Browne, 21 App. D. C. 73, 80; Johnson v. Mueser, 212 U. S. 284; Atkins v. Moore, 212 U. S. 285; Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U. S. 561; Same v. Same, 27 App. D. C. 530, 532; Taylor v. Taft, 203 U. S. 461; United States v. Lynch, 137 U. S. 280; Baltimore & Potomac R. R. Co. v. Hopkins, 130 U. S. 210, 226. The application for certiorari is also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Hopkins
130 U.S. 210 (Supreme Court, 1889)
United States v. Lynch
137 U.S. 280 (Supreme Court, 1890)
United States Ex Rel. Taylor v. Taft
203 U.S. 461 (Supreme Court, 1906)
Frasch v. Moore
211 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1908)
E. C. Atkins & Co. v. Moore
212 U.S. 285 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Gaines v. Knecht
212 U.S. 561 (Supreme Court, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 U.S. 608, 54 L. Ed. 636, 30 S. Ct. 575, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 1930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-commissioner-of-patents-v-united-states-ex-rel-newcomb-motor-scotus-1910.