Gaines v. Knecht

Supreme Court

Gaines v. Knecht

212 U.S. 561, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 14, 1908·No. 52·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]

Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578 (1908).

Pincite

212 U.S. 561 (Gaines v. Knecht) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related