Gaines v. Knecht

Supreme Court

Gaines v. Knecht

212 U.S. 561, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 14, 1908

Docket52

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 212 U.S. 561 (Gaines v. Knecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gaines v. Knecht, 212 U.S. 561, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578 (1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Frasch v. Moore, 211 U. S. 1. See act of February 20,1905, for the registration of trade-marks, C. 592, 33 Stat. 724, §§ 9, 16, 17, 18, et passim.

[The headnote in Frasch v. Moore also appears as a note to Atkins v. Moore, ante, p. 285; and see ante, p. 290, for reference to point decided in Gaines v. Knecht.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 U.S. 561, 29 S. Ct. 688, 53 L. Ed. 652, 1908 U.S. LEXIS 1578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gaines-v-knecht-scotus-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack