Moon v. State

97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 617, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 627
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 8, 1918·No. 9613·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Harwell, J.

1. When considered in connection with the charge of the court as a whole and the evidence in the casé, the instructions eom- , plained of were not erroneous foV -any reason assigned. '

2. There is no merit in the ground of the motion -for a new trial,. which assigns error because the court did not charge upon the character of the deceased for violence and turbulence. The defendant should have submitted a timely written request, if a charge on. this subject was desired. Tillman v. State, 136 Ga. 59 (70 S. E. 846). The charge of the court fairly submitted to the jury the issues in the case. The evidence amply authorized the verdict of voluntary manslaughter, no error of law appears, and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moon v. State, 97 S.E. 81, 22 Ga. App. 617, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 627 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 81 (Moon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fudge v. State
9 S.E.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Griffin v. State
177 S.E. 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Moore v. State
172 S.E. 88 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)