Moomaugh v. Everett & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Moomaugh v. Everett & Co.

13 S.E. 837, 88 Ga. 67, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 298

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 10, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 S.E. 837 (Moomaugh v. Everett & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moomaugh v. Everett & Co., 13 S.E. 837, 88 Ga. 67, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 298 (Ga. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.

Action by Moomaugh under code, §3390, commenced December 14, 1889, to recover 210 bags of flour alleged [68]*68to be of the value of $450. lie obtained a verdict for $600 on Juüe 12, 1891. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was granted unless the plaintiff would write off the excess of $450 as principal, with seven per cent, interest thereon from the date of filing the declaration to that of the verdict. To this ruling the plaintiff excepted. By cross-bill of excejrtions the defendants alleged that the court erred in certain charges and re- . fusals to charge set out in a motion for a new trial.

Simmons & Corrigan, for plaintiff. Cox & Reed, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cross-bill of exceptions dismissed.

Action by Moomaugh under code, §3390, commenced December 14, 1889, to recover 210 bags of flour alleged [68]*68to be of the value of $450. lie obtained a verdict for $600 on Juüe 12, 1891. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was granted unless the plaintiff would write off the excess of $450 as principal, with seven per cent, interest thereon from the date of filing the declaration to that of the verdict. To this ruling the plaintiff excepted. By cross-bill of excejrtions the defendants alleged that the court erred in certain charges and re- . fusals to charge set out in a motion for a new trial.

Simmons & Corrigan, for plaintiff. Cox & Reed, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 S.E. 837, 88 Ga. 67, 1891 Ga. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moomaugh-v-everett-co-ga-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack