Moody v. United National Insurance Co.

680 So. 2d 660, 1996 La. LEXIS 2832, 1996 WL 588104
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 11, 1996·No. No. 96-CC-1703·Published

Opinion

In re Louisiana Patient’s Comp. Fund; Andrews, Dr. Lucius Clay; Louisiana Patient’s Comp.Fd.OS; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CW-0427; Parish of Jefferson, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Div. “P”, No. 453-622.

Granted. La.R.S. 40:1299.44(0) contemplates a settlement between the patient and the health care provider. Since plaintiff has refused to accept the tendered $100,000, no settlement has taken place. See Ewing v. Aubert, 566 So.2d 616 (La.1990). Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the judgment of the trial court denying the motion in limine is reinstated.

KIMBALL, J., would grant and docket. WATSON, J., dissents. LEMMON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moody v. United National Insurance Co., 680 So. 2d 660, 1996 La. LEXIS 2832, 1996 WL 588104 (La. 1996).

680 So. 2d 660 (Moody v. United National Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ewing v. Aubert
566 So. 2d 616 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1990)