Montue v. Schwartz
This text of 279 F. App'x 503 (Montue v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner John C. Montue appeals pro se from the district court’s [504]*504judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the Board of Prison Term’s 1997 decision finding him ineligible for parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.
We conclude that the district court properly determined this petition was duplicative of the petition filed in district court case no. 98-01580. Therefore, the district court’s judgment dismissing the petition is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 F. App'x 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montue-v-schwartz-ca9-2008.