Montue v. Department of Corrections
This text of 279 F. App'x 506 (Montue v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner John C. Montue appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the Board of Prison Terms’ 1997 decision finding him ineligible for parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.
Notwithstanding this court’s November 22, 2004, order, we conclude that the district court did not err by refusing to permit Montue to challenge the denial of parole in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, because such a challenge is only properly brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir.2006).
All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
279 F. App'x 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montue-v-department-of-corrections-ca9-2008.