Montgomery v. State

141 So. 3d 630, 2014 WL 2753881, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9249
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2014
DocketNo. 2D13-6187
StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 3d 630 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. State, 141 So. 3d 630, 2014 WL 2753881, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9249 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Drawdy, 136 So.3d 1209, (Fla.2014); State v. Meshell, 2 So.3d 132 (Fla.2009); Hughes v. State, 22 So.3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So.2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Coughlin v. State, 932 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc).

NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WAITER v. State
965 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Hughes v. State
22 So. 3d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
State v. Meshell
2 So. 3d 132 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Coughlin v. State
932 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
State of Florida v. Eric J. Drawdy
136 So. 3d 1209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 So. 3d 630, 2014 WL 2753881, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.