Montgomery v. State

112 So. 3d 781, 2013 WL 2121750, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7964
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Montgomery v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 So. 3d 1023
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2013·No. No. 2D11-3783·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

In conducting its record review following Anders1 briefing, this court agrees that a sentencing error occurred. After supplemental briefing, the State rightly concedes the error. Specifically, Montgomery pleaded no contest to both counts of the information: (1) a violation of section 827.04(3), Florida Statutes (2009), a third-degree felony; and (2) a violation of section 800.04(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), a second-degree felony. Because Montgomery was sentenced to 120 months in prison concurrent on both counts, his sentence on Count 1 exceeded both the statutory maximum for a third-degree felony and the minimum sentence indicated in Montgomery’s Criminal Punishment Code score-sheet. See § 775.082(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (2009); Butler v. State, 838 So.2d 554, 556 (Fla.2003). We affirm without comment both convictions, as well as the sentence on Count 2. But we must vacate the sentence on Count 1 and remand for resentencing on that count only.

Affirmed in part; sentence vacated on Count 1; remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DAVIS and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montgomery v. State, 112 So. 3d 781, 2013 WL 2121750, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

112 So. 3d 781 (Montgomery v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Butler v. State
838 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)