Montgomery v. State

130 So. 34, 100 Fla. 782
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 11, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 So. 34 (Montgomery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. State, 130 So. 34, 100 Fla. 782 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Terrell, C. J.

— Plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted, tried, and convicted for the larceny of one heifer in Lee County, Florida, in November, 1929. They were each sentenced to serve two years in the State penitentiary and took writ of error to the judgment.

It is contended here that the motion to quash the indictment should have been granted and that the final judgment was illegally entered.

The indictment was ease pursuant to Section 5133, Rev. Gen. Stats, of Florida, 1920, (Section 7234, Comp. Gen. Laws of 1927) and it is sufficient for the requirement of that statute. Mobley v. State, 57 Fla. 22, 49 So. R. 941. It was not necessary to charge the value of nor the description of the animal stolen by color or flesh marks. It was sufficient to charge the genus or general species to which it belonged. Mathis v. State, 70 Fla. 194, 69 So. R. 697; Mizelle v. State, 38 Fla. 20, 20 So. R. 769.

We have examined the assignment predicated on the illegal entry of the judgment and the record proper discloses that it was regular and legally entered. No bill of exceptions is brought up for review.

The judgment below is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. State
176 So. 439 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 So. 34, 100 Fla. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-state-fla-1930.