1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GIOVANNI MONTES, Case No. 22-cv-07229-JST
9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 10 v. REOPEN; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 11 MILLER, Re: ECF No. 31 Defendant. 12
13 14 Plaintiff filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action on or about November 17, 15 2022, and it has been closed twice for failure to provide the Court with a current mailing address. 16 ECF Nos. 1, 16, 28. Plaintiff has filed a motion to reopen this action. ECF No. 31. For the 17 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; directs the Clerk 18 to VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and REOPEN this 19 case; and SETS a briefing schedule for dispositive motions. 20 DISCUSSION 21 Plaintiff filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action on or about November 17, 22 2022. ECF No. 1. On May 2, 2023, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to 23 N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11, because court mail addressed to Plaintiff had been returned to the Court as 24 undeliverable and the Court did not receive any written communication from Plaintiff indicating a 25 current address within 60 days of the court mail being returned. ECF No. 15. 26 On August 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the action. ECF No. 20. On March 27 15, 2024, the Court reopened this action. ECF No. 21. On March 28, 2024, the Court’s March 15, 1 the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to provide the Court with a current 2 address pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11. ECF No. 28. 3 On or about November 29, 2024, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff stating that he 4 wanted to continue with his case; that he was now housed at Kings County Jail and had been 5 housed there for the last five to seven months; and that Sonoma County Jail had been throwing 6 away his mail. ECF No. 31. The Court construes this letter as a request to reopen this action. 7 Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; directs 8 the Clerk to VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and 9 REOPEN this case; and SETS a briefing schedule for dispositive motions. 10 The Court cautions Plaintiff that it is his responsibility to promptly keep the Court 11 informed of any change of address. Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address in every 12 pending case every time he is moved to a new facility. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal 13 of this action pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11 or for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 14 41(b). Any future dismissals of this action for failure to provide a current address will be with 15 prejudice, as this case has already been dismissed twice on this ground. 16 CONCLUSION 17 1. The Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; and directs the Clerk to 18 VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and REOPEN this 19 case. 20 2. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the Court orders as follows: 21 a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, Defendant must file 22 and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Defendant is of the 23 opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, Defendant must so inform the 24 Court prior to the date the motion is due. A motion for summary judgment also must be 25 accompanied by a Rand notice so that Plaintiff will have fair, timely, and adequate notice of what 26 is required of him in order to oppose the motion. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 27 1 2012) (notice requirement set out in Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), must be 2 served concurrently with motion for summary judgment).1 3 b. Plaintiff’s opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion 4 must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendant no later than 28 days from the date the 5 motion is filed. Plaintiff must bear in mind the notice and warning regarding summary judgment 6 provided later in this order as he prepares his opposition to any motion for summary judgment. 7 c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the 8 opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No 9 hearing will be held on the motion. 10 3. Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the 11 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must 12 do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be 13 granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about 14 any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is 15 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing 16 makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn 17 testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out 18 specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, 19 as provided in Rule 56(c), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and 20 documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit 21 your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. 22 If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. 23 Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962–63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App. A). (The Rand notice above does 24 25 1 If Defendant asserts that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as 26 required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), defendant must raise such argument in a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014) 27 (en banc) (overruling Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003), which held that 1 not excuse defendant’s obligation to serve said notice again concurrently with a motion for 2 summary judgment. Woods, 684 F.3d at 939). 3 4. All communications by Plaintiff with the Court must be served on Defendant’s 4 || counsel by mailing a true copy of the document to Defendant’s counsel. The Court may disregard 5 any document which a party files but fails to send a copy of to his opponent. Until Defendant’s 6 || counsel has been designated, Plaintiff may mail a true copy of the document directly to Defendant, 7 but once Defendant is represented by counsel, all documents must be mailed to counsel rather than 8 || directly to Defendant. 9 5. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 GIOVANNI MONTES, Case No. 22-cv-07229-JST
9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 10 v. REOPEN; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE 11 MILLER, Re: ECF No. 31 Defendant. 12
13 14 Plaintiff filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action on or about November 17, 15 2022, and it has been closed twice for failure to provide the Court with a current mailing address. 16 ECF Nos. 1, 16, 28. Plaintiff has filed a motion to reopen this action. ECF No. 31. For the 17 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; directs the Clerk 18 to VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and REOPEN this 19 case; and SETS a briefing schedule for dispositive motions. 20 DISCUSSION 21 Plaintiff filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action on or about November 17, 22 2022. ECF No. 1. On May 2, 2023, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to 23 N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11, because court mail addressed to Plaintiff had been returned to the Court as 24 undeliverable and the Court did not receive any written communication from Plaintiff indicating a 25 current address within 60 days of the court mail being returned. ECF No. 15. 26 On August 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen the action. ECF No. 20. On March 27 15, 2024, the Court reopened this action. ECF No. 21. On March 28, 2024, the Court’s March 15, 1 the Court dismissed this action without prejudice for failure to provide the Court with a current 2 address pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11. ECF No. 28. 3 On or about November 29, 2024, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff stating that he 4 wanted to continue with his case; that he was now housed at Kings County Jail and had been 5 housed there for the last five to seven months; and that Sonoma County Jail had been throwing 6 away his mail. ECF No. 31. The Court construes this letter as a request to reopen this action. 7 Good cause being shown, the Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; directs 8 the Clerk to VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and 9 REOPEN this case; and SETS a briefing schedule for dispositive motions. 10 The Court cautions Plaintiff that it is his responsibility to promptly keep the Court 11 informed of any change of address. Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address in every 12 pending case every time he is moved to a new facility. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal 13 of this action pursuant to N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11 or for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 14 41(b). Any future dismissals of this action for failure to provide a current address will be with 15 prejudice, as this case has already been dismissed twice on this ground. 16 CONCLUSION 17 1. The Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 31; and directs the Clerk to 18 VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement at ECF Nos. 28, 29, and REOPEN this 19 case. 20 2. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the Court orders as follows: 21 a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, Defendant must file 22 and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Defendant is of the 23 opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, Defendant must so inform the 24 Court prior to the date the motion is due. A motion for summary judgment also must be 25 accompanied by a Rand notice so that Plaintiff will have fair, timely, and adequate notice of what 26 is required of him in order to oppose the motion. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 27 1 2012) (notice requirement set out in Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), must be 2 served concurrently with motion for summary judgment).1 3 b. Plaintiff’s opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion 4 must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendant no later than 28 days from the date the 5 motion is filed. Plaintiff must bear in mind the notice and warning regarding summary judgment 6 provided later in this order as he prepares his opposition to any motion for summary judgment. 7 c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the 8 opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No 9 hearing will be held on the motion. 10 3. Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the 11 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must 12 do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be 13 granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about 14 any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is 15 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing 16 makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn 17 testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out 18 specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, 19 as provided in Rule 56(c), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and 20 documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit 21 your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. 22 If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. 23 Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962–63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App. A). (The Rand notice above does 24 25 1 If Defendant asserts that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as 26 required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), defendant must raise such argument in a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014) 27 (en banc) (overruling Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003), which held that 1 not excuse defendant’s obligation to serve said notice again concurrently with a motion for 2 summary judgment. Woods, 684 F.3d at 939). 3 4. All communications by Plaintiff with the Court must be served on Defendant’s 4 || counsel by mailing a true copy of the document to Defendant’s counsel. The Court may disregard 5 any document which a party files but fails to send a copy of to his opponent. Until Defendant’s 6 || counsel has been designated, Plaintiff may mail a true copy of the document directly to Defendant, 7 but once Defendant is represented by counsel, all documents must be mailed to counsel rather than 8 || directly to Defendant. 9 5. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 10 No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16 is required 11 before the parties may conduct discovery. 12 6. Plaintiff is responsible for prosecuting this case. Plaintiff must promptly keep the 5 13 Court informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely 14 || fashion. Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address in every pending case every time he is 3 15 moved to a new facility. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to 16 || N.D. Cal. L.R. 3-11 or for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Any future 3 17 || dismissals of this action for failure to provide a current address will be with prejudice, as this case 18 || has already been dismissed twice on this ground. 19 7. Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought 20 || to be extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause. 21 8. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must include the case name and case number for this 22 || case on any document he submits to the Court for consideration in this case. 23 This order terminates ECF No. 31. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 30, 2024 .
26 JON S. TIGAR 7 ited States District Judge 28