Montes v. Miller

District Court, N.D. California·Decided March 15, 2024·No. 4:22-cv-07229·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GIOVANNI MONTES, Case No. 22-cv-07229-JST

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO 9 v. REOPEN; VACATING DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT; REOPENING 10 MILLER, ACTION; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK 11 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 20

12 13 Plaintiff has filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. ECF No. 1. On May 2, 14 2023, the Court dismissed this action and entered judgment against Plaintiff pursuant to N.D. Cal. 15 L.R. 3-11, because court mail addressed to Plaintiff had been returned to the Court as 16 undeliverable and the Court did not receive any written communication from Plaintiff indicating a 17 current address within 60 days of the court mail being returned. ECF Nos. 15, 16. Plaintiff has 18 since filed a motion requesting that this case proceed, which the Court construes as a motion to 19 reopen the action. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has also provided a current mailing address. Id. 20 Accordingly, the Court orders as follows. 21 1. The Court GRANTS the motion to reopen, ECF No. 20; and directs the Clerk to 22 VACATE the Order of Dismissal and related judgement (ECF Nos. 15, 16) and REOPEN this 23 case. 24 2. It appears that defendant Sonoma County Jail sergeant Miller has not yet been 25 served, despite the Court’s order directing service (ECF No. 9). The Court therefore orders the 26 Clerk to issue summons and the United States Marshal to serve, without prepayment of fees, a 27 copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1), with all attachments thereto, and a copy of the order of service 1 2777 Ventura Ave, Santa Rosa CA 95403. A courtesy copy of the complaint with attachments 2 and this order shall also be mailed to the Sonoma County Counsel, at 575 Administrative Drive, 3 Room 105, Santa Rosa, CA 95403. 4 3. In order to expedite the resolution of this case, the Court orders as follows: 5 a. No later than 91 days from the date this order is filed, Defendant must file 6 and serve a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Defendant is of the 7 opinion that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, Defendant must so inform the 8 Court prior to the date the motion is due. A motion for summary judgment also must be 9 accompanied by a Rand notice so that Plaintiff will have fair, timely, and adequate notice of what 10 is required of him in order to oppose the motion. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 11 2012) (notice requirement set out in Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998), must be 12 served concurrently with motion for summary judgment).1 13 b. Plaintiff’s opposition to the summary judgment or other dispositive motion 14 must be filed with the Court and served upon Defendant no later than 28 days from the date the 15 motion is filed. Plaintiff must bear in mind the notice and warning regarding summary judgment 16 provided later in this order as he prepares his opposition to any motion for summary judgment. 17 c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than 14 days after the date the 18 opposition is filed. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No 19 hearing will be held on the motion. 20 4. Plaintiff is advised that a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the 21 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. Rule 56 tells you what you must 22 do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be 23 granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact – that is, if there is no real dispute about 24 any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is 25 1 If Defendant asserts that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as 26 required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), defendant must raise such argument in a motion for summary judgment, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2014) 27 (en banc) (overruling Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th Cir. 2003), which held that 1 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing 2 makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn 3 testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out 4 specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, 5 as provided in Rule 56(c), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and 6 documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit 7 your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. 8 If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial. Rand v. 9 Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962–63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) (App. A). (The Rand notice above does 10 not excuse defendant’s obligation to serve said notice again concurrently with a motion for 11 summary judgment. Woods, 684 F.3d at 939). 12 5. All communications by Plaintiff with the Court must be served on Defendant’s 13 counsel by mailing a true copy of the document to Defendant’s counsel. The Court may disregard 14 any document which a party files but fails to send a copy of to his opponent. Until Defendant’s 15 counsel has been designated, Plaintiff may mail a true copy of the document directly to Defendant, 16 but once Defendant is represented by counsel, all documents must be mailed to counsel rather than 17 directly to Defendant. 18 6. Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16 is required 20 before the parties may conduct discovery. 21 7. Plaintiff is responsible for prosecuting this case. Plaintiff must promptly keep the 22 Court informed of any change of address and must comply with the Court’s orders in a timely 23 fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant 24 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff must file a notice of change of address in every 25 pending case every time he is moved to a new facility. 26 8. Any motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than the deadline sought 27 to be extended and must be accompanied by a showing of good cause. 1 9. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must include the case name and case number for this 2 || case on any document he submits to the Court for consideration in this case. 3 This order terminates ECF No. 20. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. ® 5 Dated: March 15, 2024 es 6 JON S. TIGA 7 nited States District Judge 8 9 10 11 a 12

13 14

15 16

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montes v. Miller, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Montes v. Miller (Montes v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Earnest Woods, II v. Tom Carey
684 F.3d 934 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Juan Albino v. Lee Baca
747 F.3d 1162 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Wyatt v. Terhune
315 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)