Montanino v. Rowley
This text of 39 A.D.3d 653 (Montanino v. Rowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 to remove the respondents William J. Rowley, Christopher D. Bodkin, and Pamela Greene from public office in the Town of Islip. Separate motions by the respondents pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), in effect, to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action. Cross motion by the petitioners for leave to conduct discovery and for the appointment of a referee.
Ordered that the motions pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action are granted; and it is further,
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, on the merits; and it is further,
Ordered that the petitioners’ cross motion for leave to conduct discovery and for the appointment of a referee is denied as academic; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
The petition fails to allege misconduct by the respondents [654]*654which rises to the level necessary to justify the extreme remedy of removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 (see Feustel v Rosenblum, 36 AD3d 615 [2007]; Matter of Callari v Bailes, 302 AD2d 595 [2003]).
The cross motion for leave to conduct discovery and for the appointment of a referee is denied as academic. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Garni and McCarthy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 A.D.3d 653, 831 N.Y.S.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montanino-v-rowley-nyappdiv-2007.