Haase v. Del Vecchio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haase v. Del Vecchio

90 A.D.3d 756, 934 N.Y.2d 330

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The allegations in the petition do not rise to the level of misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance, or malversation necessary to justify the extreme remedy of removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 (see Matter of Futia v [757]*757Weaver, 85 AD3d 1165 [2011]; Matter of Montanino v Rowley, 39 AD3d 653 [2007]; Matter of Deats v Carpenter, 61 AD2d 320, 322 [1978]).

We decline the respondent’s request for the imposition of sanctions against the petitioners in connection with this proceeding (see Rules of Chief Administrator of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1.1).

In light of our determination, the respondent’s remaining contention has been rendered academic. Rivera, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The allegations in the petition do not rise to the level of misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance, or malversation necessary to justify the extreme remedy of removal from office pursuant to Public Officers Law § 36 (see Matter of Futia v [757]*757Weaver, 85 AD3d 1165 [2011]; Matter of Montanino v Rowley, 39 AD3d 653 [2007]; Matter of Deats v Carpenter, 61 AD2d 320, 322 [1978]).

We decline the respondent’s request for the imposition of sanctions against the petitioners in connection with this proceeding (see Rules of Chief Administrator of Cts [22 NYCRR] § 130-1.1).

In light of our determination, the respondent’s remaining contention has been rendered academic. Rivera, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Haase v. Del Vecchio, 90 A.D.3d 756, 934 N.Y.2d 330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

90 A.D.3d 756 (Haase v. Del Vecchio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related