Monroe v. County of Rockland

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 7, 2021·No. 7:21-cv-05244·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT loLaereoncanaa was SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BOYNE MICHAEL J. MONROE, Plaintiff, : Copiok Mailedaxed V. ORDER Chambers Of Vincent L. Bricce COUNTY OF ROCKLAND; MASI, Food 21 CV 5244 (VB) Service Supervisor; and JOULIANA : PETRANAKER, H.S.A. Nurse Administrator, : Defendants. : oe te eo ne ee a eK On November 19, 2021, defendants moved to dismiss. The notice of motion provided that plaintiff’s opposition was due on November 29, 2021, and defendants’ reply was due on December 6, 2021. (Doc. #14). To date, plaintiff has not responded to defendants’ motion. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s deadline to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss is sua sponte extended to January 6, 2022. Any reply by defendants shall be filed by January 20, 2022. No further extensions of plaintiff’s deadline to oppose defendants’ motion shall be granted. Should plaintiff fail to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss by January 6, 2022, the Court will deem the motion fully submitted and decide it in due course. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: December 7, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe v. County of Rockland, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Monroe v. County of Rockland (Monroe v. County of Rockland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)