Monroe County Department of Social Services ex rel. Mercado v. Mercado

241 A.D.2d 948, 661 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 241 A.D.2d 948 (Monroe County Department of Social Services ex rel. Mercado v. Mercado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monroe County Department of Social Services ex rel. Mercado v. Mercado, 241 A.D.2d 948, 661 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Family Court properly granted the objections of petitioner to the order of the Hearing Examiner awarding child support. The record, however, does not support the court’s child support award in the amount of $96 per week for respondent’s two minor children. The Child Support Standards Act (CSSA) (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [i]; Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [i]) provides that the relevant income figure is “gross (total) income as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return.” Nothing in the statute prohibits reliance upon partial information from a tax year not yet completed (see, Matter of Paul v Rodems, 226 AD2d 1047, 1048).

There is nothing in the record to support the finding that respondent was earning $418 per week at his current employment. The documentary evidence (a pay stub) indicates a gross pay of $648 biweekly or $324 per week. Utilizing that figure, we conclude that respondent’s child support obligation under the statutory CSSA formula is $75 per week.

Therefore, we modify the order by setting respondent’s child [949]*949support obligation in the amount of $63 per week for the period frota. December 7, 1995 to February 18, 1996, and in the amount of $75 per week from February 19, 1996, with any overpayments under the current order to be credited to any arrears or, if there are no arrears, to be refunded to respondent. (Appeal from Order of Monroe County Family Court, Taddeo, J.—Support.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Culhane v. Holt
28 A.D.3d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Talero v. Talero
1 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Kellogg v. Kellogg
300 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Winnert-Marzinek v. Winnert
291 A.D.2d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 A.D.2d 948, 661 N.Y.S.2d 323, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-county-department-of-social-services-ex-rel-mercado-v-mercado-nyappdiv-1997.