Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company
This text of 305 F.2d 375 (Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
305 F.2d 375
MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 15037.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
August 6, 1962.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division, at Memphis; Marion Speed Boyd, Chief Judge.
Don K. Harness & Robert L. Boynton, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.
Robert F. Conrad, Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., Ewell & Ewell, Dyersburg, Tenn., Albert E. Strasser, Yungblut, Melville, Strasser & Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio., for appellee.
Before CECIL, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated and this cause is remanded for consideration in the light of Dairy Queen Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 82 S. Ct. 894, 8 L.Ed.2d 44 and Shubin v. United States District Court, 369 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1035, 8 L.Ed.2d 273.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F.2d 375, 135 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-auto-equipment-company-v-heckethorn-manufacturing-supply-company-ca6-1962.