Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company

305 F.2d 375, 135 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F.2d 406
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 6, 1962·No. 15037·Published

Opinion

305 F.2d 375

MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
HECKETHORN MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15037.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

August 6, 1962.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Western Division, at Memphis; Marion Speed Boyd, Chief Judge.

Don K. Harness & Robert L. Boynton, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Armstrong, McCadden, Allen, Braden & Goodman, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

Robert F. Conrad, Watson, Cole, Grindle & Watson, Washington, D. C., Ewell & Ewell, Dyersburg, Tenn., Albert E. Strasser, Yungblut, Melville, Strasser & Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio., for appellee.

Before CECIL, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and this cause is remanded for consideration in the light of Dairy Queen Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 82 S. Ct. 894, 8 L.Ed.2d 44 and Shubin v. United States District Court, 369 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1035, 8 L.Ed.2d 273.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company, 305 F.2d 375, 135 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 1 (6th Cir. 1962).

305 F.2d 375 (Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood
369 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Kemp v. United States
369 U.S. 661 (Supreme Court, 1962)