Kemp v. United States

Supreme Court

Kemp v. United States

369 U.S. 661, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1275

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 14, 1962

Docket311, Misc

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 369 U.S. 661 (Kemp v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemp v. United States, 369 U.S. 661, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1275 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in the Coppedge case. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 U.S. 661, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-united-states-scotus-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack