Kemp v. United States
369 U.S. 661, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1275
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Coppedge v. United States, ante, p. 438.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kemp v. United States, 369 U.S. 661, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1275 (1962).
369 U.S. 661 (Kemp v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cruz v. Hauck
404 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
214 F. Supp. 704 (W.D. Tennessee, 1963)
Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Co.
305 F.2d 375 (Sixth Circuit, 1962)
Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company
305 F.2d 375 (Sixth Circuit, 1962)