MONFISTON v. State

54 So. 3d 632, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 2011 WL 611863
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2011·No. 4D09-5232·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Franklin Monfiston challenges the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion was filed within two years of the date that the Supreme Court of Florida disposed of his petition for review of this court’s decision on direct appeal. As such, his motion was timely filed. See Ortiz v. State, 4 So.3d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Witt v. State, 861 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Perkins v. State, 845 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cargle v. State, 800 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to entertain appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONFISTON v. State, 54 So. 3d 632, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 2011 WL 611863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

54 So. 3d 632 (MONFISTON v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leighty v. State
87 So. 3d 1262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)