MONFISTON v. State

69 So. 3d 977, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12896, 2011 WL 3586131
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2011·No. 4D09-1060·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Anthony v. State, 980 So.2d 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), rev. denied, 6 So.3d 607 (Fla.2009). Appellant argues the second claim of his postconviction motion which this court did not discuss in its remand in Monfiston v. State, 946 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). This court affirmed the summary denial of that claim in the prior appeal.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MONFISTON v. State, 69 So. 3d 977, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12896, 2011 WL 3586131 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

69 So. 3d 977 (MONFISTON v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Franklin Monfiston v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
559 F. App'x 863 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)