MONFISTON v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MONFISTON v. State

54 So. 3d 632, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 2011 WL 611863

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2011

Docket4D09-5232

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 So. 3d 632 (MONFISTON v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MONFISTON v. State, 54 So. 3d 632, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 2011 WL 611863 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Franklin Monfiston challenges the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion was filed within two years of the date that the Supreme Court of Florida disposed of his petition for review of this court’s decision on direct appeal. As such, his motion was timely filed. See Ortiz v. State, 4 So.3d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Witt v. State, 861 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Perkins v. State, 845 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cargle v. State, 800 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to entertain appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Franklin Monfiston challenges the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Appellant’s motion was filed within two years of the date that the Supreme Court of Florida disposed of his petition for review of this court’s decision on direct appeal. As such, his motion was timely filed. See Ortiz v. State, 4 So.3d 794 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Witt v. State, 861 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Perkins v. State, 845 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Cargle v. State, 800 So.2d 698 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the circuit court to entertain appellant’s motion for postconviction relief.

Reversed and Remanded.

STEVENSON, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 So. 3d 632, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2238, 2011 WL 611863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monfiston-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack