Money Mailer, LLC v. Wade Brewer
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 MONEY MAILER, LLC, 8 NO. C15-1215RSL Plaintiff, 9 v. SECOND ORDER FOR FURTHER 10 BRIEFING WADE G. BREWER, 11 Defendant. 12 13
14 This matter comes before the Court on “Wade Brewer’s Motion for Adequate Security.” 15 Dkt. # 267. On June 3, 2020, the Court directed Money Mailer to address the third factor of the 16 17 Simulnet E. Assocs. v. Ramada Hotel Operating Co., 37 F.3d 573, 576 (9th Cir. 1994), analysis, 18 namely whether it has the financial wherewithal to post a bond of $640,000. Money Mailer’s 19 response is so general that it provides virtually no information regarding the structure of the 20 assignment agreements, the short- and long-term impacts of the agreements on its finances, or 21 the costs of obtaining a bond. Having reviewed the evidence submitted by defendant, it is 22 23 entirely possible that, although Money Mailer is currently shorn of its assets, any funds and 24 assets left after the Assignee administers the claims process for unsecured creditors will revert 25 back to Money Mailer. In addition, if, as Money Mailer contends, all of its assets have been 26 transferred to the Assignee (with or without a reversionary interest), it may no longer have 27 1 standing to pursue this litigation. 2 The Clerk of Court is directed to renote Brewer’s motion for adequate security (Dkt. 3 # 267) on the Court’s calendar for Friday, July 3, 2020. Within five days of the date of this 4 Order, Money Mailer shall provide additional briefing (not to exceed six pages) and evidence 5 regarding (a) its right to pursue this litigation in light of the alleged sale of all of its assets, (b) its 6 7 assets, liabilities, and income following the transfer to the Assignee, (c) its projections or 8 forecasts regarding income it anticipates receiving through any reversionary provision in the 9 assignment agreements, related contracts, or governing statutes, and (d) the costs of obtaining a 10 bond in the amount of $640,000. Brewer may file a response of no more than six pages within 11 seven days of Money Mailer’s filing. Money Mailer may file a reply of no more than three pages 12 on or before the note date. 13 14 15 Dated this 18th day of June, 2020. 16 A 17 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Money Mailer, LLC v. Wade Brewer (Money Mailer, LLC v. Wade Brewer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.