Mondello v. Beekman

78 A.D.2d 824, 433 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13505
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 78 A.D.2d 824 (Mondello v. Beekman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mondello v. Beekman, 78 A.D.2d 824, 433 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 19, 1979, remanding petitioner’s application for a line of duty disability retirement to respondents for a determination and granting other relief, is reversed, on the law, and the petition is dismissed, without costs. The question whether petitioner is permanently disabled is a medical question on which the opinion of the fire department’s 1-B medical board is conclusive unless arbitrary or capricious. After many examinations and consultations, the medical board came to the conclusion that petitioner was not permanently disabled stating: “It is the opinion of the 1-B Medical Board that he is temporarily disabled by virtue of his refusal to accept proper medical treatment and we do not consider him permanently disabled at this time.” This is not the same as an order to petitioner to undergo surgery. But in determining whether petitioner is permanently disabled, the medical board has a right to consider whether proper medical treatment (including surgery) is reasonably and safely available to correct the disability, and if it is, the board has the right to consider the disability a temporary one. We have been informed that after the determination by the medical board here sought to be reviewed, the medical board at a later date found petitioner to be permanently disabled but apparently not as a result of line of duty, and that the board of trustees of the pension fund has deferred action on petitioner’s case pending determination of this appeal. The record now before us is not addressed to these events, and our determination is without prejudice to any future CPLR article 78 proceeding based on events after the filing of the petition herein. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Agard v. Gardner
2025 NY Slip Op 01855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Smith v. Shea
2022 NY Slip Op 05969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of McGarry v. DiNapoliI
2017 NY Slip Op 6229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Delgrande v. Greenville Fire Dist.
126 A.D.3d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Dingee v. DiNapoli
56 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Mullins v. New York State Comptroller
49 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Kuczinski v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department
8 A.D.3d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Fergus v. Hevesi
6 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Cole-Hatchard v. McCall
305 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Topkin v. Board of Education
121 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
MATTER OF MONDELLO v. Beekman
434 N.E.2d 1341 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.2d 824, 433 N.Y.S.2d 439, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mondello-v-beekman-nyappdiv-1980.