MATTER OF MONDELLO v. Beekman
434 N.E.2d 1341, 56 N.Y.2d 513, 449 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3206
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (78 AD2d 824). We *515 would only add that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that his refusal to accept corrective medical treatment, including surgery, found by the medical board to constitute proper treatment in this case, should be excused.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MATTER OF MONDELLO v. Beekman, 434 N.E.2d 1341, 56 N.Y.2d 513, 449 N.Y.S.2d 963, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3206 (N.Y. 1982).
434 N.E.2d 1341 (MATTER OF MONDELLO v. Beekman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Smith v. Shea
2022 NY Slip Op 05969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of McGarry v. DiNapoliI
2017 NY Slip Op 6229 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Dingee v. DiNapoli
56 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Mullins v. New York State Comptroller
49 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Dymond v. Hevesi
24 A.D.3d 938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Kuczinski v. Board of Trustees of New York City Fire Department
8 A.D.3d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Fergus v. Hevesi
6 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Cole-Hatchard v. McCall
305 A.D.2d 913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Schenectady Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board
650 N.E.2d 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Topkin v. Board of Education
121 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)