Monday v. Utter

15 Ind. 447, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 482
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Guriam.

The only point made is, that there was a trial without a replication to the answer of set-off and counterclaim.

' The suit was instituted and the pleadings filed before a justice of the peace, where it is specially provided by the statute that a replication is not necessary. 2 R. S., § 37, p. 458; Button v. Lent, 10 Ind. 365; Perk. Pr. 98.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monday v. Utter, 15 Ind. 447, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 482 (Ind. 1860).

15 Ind. 447 (Monday v. Utter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Meter v. Barnett
20 N.E. 426 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
Heller v. Crawford
37 Ind. 279 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)