Button v. Lent

10 Ind. 365
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 2, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Ind. 365 (Button v. Lent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Button v. Lent, 10 Ind. 365 (Ind. 1858).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit commenced before a justice of the peace on an account. A bill of particulars was filed. The defendant filed a bill of particulars as a set-off. Trial. Judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal to the Common Pleas.

Trial and judgment for the plaintiff.

H. P. Biddle, B. W. Peters and D. D. Dykeman, for the appellant.

The only error assigned is that there was a trial without an issue.

The general denial, except non est factum, is in by law, without being pleaded,-in suits before a justice of the peace. And under it, everything but the statute of limitations, set-off, and matter in abatement, may be given in evidence. 2 R. S. p. 455, § 34. The filing of a bill of particulars of an account, is a sufficient plea of set-off before a justice. 2 R. S. p. 458, § 36. No replication is required. Id. § 37.

An issue good before the justice, is good in the Circuit Court on appeal. 2 R. S. p. 463, § 67.

The judgment is affirmed with 10 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heller v. Crawford
37 Ind. 279 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Monday v. Utter
15 Ind. 447 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ind. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/button-v-lent-ind-1858.