Moment v. O'Malley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2090

MICHAEL MOMENT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARTIN O’MALLEY; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER; ISIAH LEGGEIL; ANN HARRINGTON; THOMAS L. CRAVEN; BRIAN G. KIM; JESSICA M. HALL; JOHN M. STAYER; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02209-AW)

Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant

to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. ∗ We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. O’Malley, No.

8:09-cv-02209-AW (D. Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

∗ Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).