Moment v. O'Malley

368 F. App'x 359
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2010·No. No. 09-2090·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moment v. O’Malley, No. 8:09-cv-02209-AW (D.Md. filed Sept. 16, 2009; entered Sept. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moment v. O'Malley, 368 F. App'x 359 (4th Cir. 2010).

368 F. App'x 359 (Moment v. O'Malley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)