Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.
This text of 521 F.3d 1215 (Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
All judges on the panel have voted to deny Plaintiff' Appellant’s Petition for Panel Rehearing, and so that petition is DENIED.
The full court has been advised of Plaintiff/Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing En Banc, and a judge of this court requested a vote on whether this case should be reheard en banc; however, a majority of the non-recused active judges of the court did not vote in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Accordingly, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be considered.
Judges Graber and Fisher were recused from considering the en banc issues in this case and did not participate in the court’s decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 F.3d 1215, 2008 WL 919706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molski-v-evergreen-dynasty-corp-ca9-2008.