Molloy v. Molloy
This text of 243 Mich. App. 801 (Molloy v. Molloy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court orders that a special
panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(H) to resolve the conflict between this case and Hilliard v Schmidt, 231 Mich App 316; 586 NW2d 263 (1998).
The Court finds under MCR 7.215(H)(5) that the conflict at issue affects the best interests analysis found on pages 4 to 6 of the opinion released December 15, 2000, and that portion of the opinion is vacated. In addition, that portion of the opinion remanding for hearing on joint legal and physical custody is held in abeyance pending the decision of the conflict panel.
The appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the clerk’s certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant’s brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 Mich. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molloy-v-molloy-michctapp-2001.