Molina v. State
This text of 867 So. 2d 645 (Molina v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Oscar E. MOLINA, IV, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Roy A. Heimlich, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr. and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEPHERD, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We agree that the defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in an in-patient drug treatment program as required as a condition of his probation. Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1981); Smith v. State, 849 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
867 So. 2d 645, 2004 WL 575738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molina-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.