Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Molina v. State

Molina v. State

867 So. 2d 645, 2004 WL 575738
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2004·No. 3D03-1076·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

867 So.2d 645 (2004)

Oscar E. MOLINA, IV, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D03-1076.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 2004.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Roy A. Heimlich, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr. and Fredericka Sands, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We agree that the defendant was not entitled to credit for time served in an in-patient drug treatment program as required as a condition of his probation. Pennington v. State, 398 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1981); Smith v. State, 849 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Toney v. State, 817 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Molina v. State, 867 So. 2d 645, 2004 WL 575738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 645 (Molina v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. State
941 So. 2d 474 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Carrier v. State
925 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Comer v. State
909 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Cregan
908 So. 2d 387 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Hamilton v. State
898 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cregan v. State
884 So. 2d 127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Obando v. State
867 So. 2d 645 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)