Gardner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gardner v. State

925 So. 2d 428, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4926, 2006 WL 861301

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 5, 2006

DocketNo. 3D05-2668

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 925 So. 2d 428 (Gardner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardner v. State, 925 So. 2d 428, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4926, 2006 WL 861301 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the trial court indicates on the order that the denial was pursuant to an evidentiary hearing, it is in the form of a summary denial and no transcripts or record are attached in support of the decision. On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although the trial court indicates on the order that the denial was pursuant to an evidentiary hearing, it is in the form of a summary denial and no transcripts or record are attached in support of the decision. On appeal from a summary denial, this court must reverse unless the postconviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the attachment of record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 So. 2d 428, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4926, 2006 WL 861301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack