Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2020
Docket3:19-cv-08438
StatusUnknown

This text of Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC (Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

| UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2724

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —10)

On August 5, 2016, the Panel transferred 1 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 227 F.Supp.3d 1402 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 48 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M. Rufe. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and assigned to Judge Rufe. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the reasons stated in the order of August 5, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cynthia M. Rufe. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

pendngatthane te FOR THE PANEL: LM PA oreD oes nn John W. Nichols 4 . at". . anne. Wass, Clerk of the Panel ee ER [ “RSE CRN. 8 Rake RECORD prea: aie] S | 63 Se arrest BAUR hn Dee, DEPUTY □□□ UpsrED STANES GIGIET COUPT AST eMan VAP OS ORS □□ LS ig eee AAAS

IN RE: GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDI. No. 2724

SCHEDULE CTO-10 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. CANO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 19-08438 Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al

. ayy; ws Meee on. SEs See AAS + aks we ist AEE S ey 7 Saw ~ et TG

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Generic Drug Pricing Antitrust Litigation
227 F. Supp. 3d 1402 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Molina Healthcare, Inc. v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molina-healthcare-inc-v-actavis-elizabeth-llc-cand-2020.