Molfino v. Yuen
This text of Molfino v. Yuen (Molfino v. Yuen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-10-0000150 SCWC-10-0000150 17-JAN-2014 08:20 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
GEOFFREY MOLFINO,
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CHRISTOPHER J. YUEN, in his capacity as Planning Director,
County of Hawaii; COUNTY OF HAWAII; JOHN DOES 1-10;
JANE DOES 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10;
DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-10; and DOE ENTITIES 1-10,
Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
_______________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-10-0000150; CIV. NO. 07-1-0378)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakasone, in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Geoffrey Molfino’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on December 9, 2013, is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling of the oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 17, 2014.
Peter Van Name Esser /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Laureen L. Martin and Michael J. Udovic /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Molfino v. Yuen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molfino-v-yuen-haw-2014.