Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.

340 F.2d 319, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 22, 1965
Docket20966
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 340 F.2d 319 (Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., 340 F.2d 319, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mohasco Industries, Inc., the plaintiff below, complains of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in favor of appellees (defendants) in an action for patent infringement. The trial court held that the patents in issue were invalid and void and not infringed by the defendants. We are in agreement with the result reached by the trial court. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 191 (1963). The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
857 F. Supp. 308 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Florida East Coast Railway Company v. United States
340 F.2d 319 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 F.2d 319, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohasco-industries-inc-v-e-t-barwick-mills-inc-and-barwick-carpet-ca5-1965.