Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.

340 F.2d 319, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 22, 1965·No. 20966·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mohasco Industries, Inc., the plaintiff below, complains of the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in favor of appellees (defendants) in an action for patent infringement. The trial court held that the patents in issue were invalid and void and not infringed by the defendants. We are in agreement with the result reached by the trial court. Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 191 (1963). The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., 340 F.2d 319, 144 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 288 (5th Cir. 1965).

340 F.2d 319 (Mohasco Industries, Inc. v. E. T. Barwick Mills, Inc. And Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Permahedge, Inc. v. Barcana, Inc.
857 F. Supp. 308 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Florida East Coast Railway Company v. United States
340 F.2d 319 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)