Mohammad v. State

995 N.E.2d 228, 136 Ohio St. 3d 326
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 5, 2013·No. No. 2012-2123·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} Appellant’s motion to summarily reverse is granted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mohammad v. State, 995 N.E.2d 228, 136 Ohio St. 3d 326 (Ohio 2013).

995 N.E.2d 228 (Mohammad v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bundy v. State
36 N.E.3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Mohammad v. State
2013 Ohio 3669 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)