Mohammad v. State

2013 Ohio 3669
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 5, 2013
Docket2012-2123
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2013 Ohio 3669 (Mohammad v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mohammad v. State, 2013 Ohio 3669 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

[Cite as Mohammad v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 326, 2013-Ohio-3669.]

MOHAMMAD, APPELLEE, v. THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT. [Cite as Mohammad v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 326, 2013-Ohio-3669.] Appellant’s motion to summarily reverse is granted. Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State. (No. 2012-2123—Submitted August 21, 2013—Decided September 5, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 98655, 2012-Ohio-5517. ____________________ {¶ 1} Appellant’s motion to summarily reverse is granted. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded on the authority of Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181, 2013-Ohio-2163, 992 N.E.2d 1111. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Terry H. Gilbert, for appellee. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Peter K. Glenn-Applegate, Deputy Solicitor; and Timothy J. McGinty, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Brian R. Gutkoski, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. ________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bundy v. State
36 N.E.3d 158 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2013 Ohio 3669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohammad-v-state-ohio-2013.