Moerman v. Kalamazoo County Road Commission

141 Mich. App. 154
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1984·No. Docket No. 58635·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing

Before: D. F. Walsh, P.J., and R. M. Maher and T. Roumell,* JJ.

Per Curiam.

In Moerman v Kalamazoo County Road Comm, 129 Mich App 584; 341 NW2d 829 (1983), we held that numerous errors had denied plaintiff a fair trial and we reversed the judgment of the trial court. Defendant moved for rehearing, arguing that this Court had misunderstood a factual question in the case (the position of the tree struck by the decedent’s car in relation to the shoulder of the road) and that this Court’s opinion had failed to address various arguments raised by defendant. After reconsideration, we conclude that our original opinion was wrongly decided for the reasons expressed in Judge Walsh’s dissent to that opinion. 129 Mich App 597. We therefore reverse our original ruling and affirm the judgment of the trial court._

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moerman v. Kalamazoo County Road Commission, 141 Mich. App. 154 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984).

141 Mich. App. 154 (Moerman v. Kalamazoo County Road Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moerman v. KALAMAZOO CTY,. RD. COMM.
366 N.W.2d 223 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1984)